‘Nowadays, the pleasures of reading can never compete with the pleasures of visual entertainment.’ To what extent do you agree?

YES: Visual entertainmentprovide leisure options unavailable to reading, overwhelming the latter’s capacity to provide entertainment and pleasure to modern society. 

  1. Many forms of visual entertainment meet our modern demand for instant gratification, making the introspective pleasures of reading much less appealing by comparison.

  2. Compared to reading which is often a personal activity, many forms of visual entertainment such as internet gaming are participative in nature, satisfying more thoroughly our desire to relate and connect with others.

  3. Various visual entertainment platforms such as 3D movies provide highly appealing and engaging aesthetic experiences, effortlessly bringing imaginary worlds to life for the masses at a rate that books have difficulty competing against.

NO: Despite its many appeals, visual entertainment remains separate from reading and the latter retains many unique attractions for modern society.

  1. Reading provides an introspective and reflective experience for many individuals, making it attractive to those who crave an escape from the constant stimulation of visual entertainment.

  2. Many social activities can be structured around the act of reading, such as book-reading clubs in libraries, enabling enriching intellectual engagement with others and providing a viable alternative to visual entertainment that involve social participation.  

  3. Well-written books appeal to fans both old and new, and the stories they narrate – be it fictional or non-fictional –oftencompelling many to invest sufficient time and effort to reading and deriving pleasure from them, even if it takes us away from our visual entertainment platforms.